Log in

No account? Create an account
Now mostly on Facebook (and rarely caught up even there)
Op-ed on the relevance of the UN Security Council 
2nd-Mar-2003 01:29 pm
Me: on Ferris wheel 2012-09-09

I stumbled across this fairly interesting (if also fairly obvious) Washington Post op-ed piece by Anne-Marie Slaughter:

In summary, she argues that far from being irrelevant, the UN Security Council has lately been doing exactly what it was designed to do. (And in passing, she clears up a mystery I'd wondered about for a while: How could US forces in the Korean War have operated under UN auspices when North Korea's patron the Soviet Union had a veto in the Security Council? Answer: The USSR was boycotting the Security Council when the resolution authorizing force was introduced.)

Personally, I think the surest route to irrelevance for the Security Council (albeit not the UN as a whole) is if it appeases one particular irrational unelected leader I can think of with expansionist delusions, and turns itself into nothing more than another arm of US foreign policy. The world already has the US State Department, the US Department of Defense, and the CIA; it doesn't particularly need another body serving exactly the same interests.

2nd-Mar-2003 02:11 pm (UTC)
This is sort of off topic, But I love your new pic! :)
2nd-Mar-2003 03:06 pm (UTC)
Thanks! That makes me feel a little less silly about the time I spent drawing the fingers. :-)
2nd-Mar-2003 04:25 pm (UTC) - relevance of the security council
I made some comments about what I think the security council's role is, in a subthread in this debate
2nd-Mar-2003 04:55 pm (UTC) - Re: relevance of the security council
Excellent posts; thanks for pointing me at them. I have a copy of Taliban, but I haven't read it yet; hope to do that soon.
This page was loaded Mar 23rd 2019, 2:23 pm GMT.