?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Beowabbit
Now mostly on Facebook (and rarely caught up even there)
Book (and media) log 
23rd-Feb-2012 10:26 pm
Misc: spines of old books
Some of what I’ve been reading and watching lately:
  • The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters, by B. R. Myers This was a fascinating read. I never was able to shake the awareness that I was seeing North Korea through the filter of one person, though. (For instance, there are several places where Myers writes, essentially, All other Western North Korea experts think that X, because they’re deceived by Y, but I know that Z.) And some of the contrasts he tries to make between the North Korean personality cult and (say) those of Stalin’s USSR or Ceauşescu’s Romania seem somewhat contrived — sure, North Korea is really an authoritarian rightist state with a very thin Marxist veneer, and lots of other layers, rather than a socialist state organized along Marxist principles. But the same is true to varying degrees of the Soviet Union, China, and so on, and to say that North Korea is different from Stalin’s USSR because it’s not really Marxist is a bit unconvincing. But it was certainly a fascinating read, and maybe any book about North Korea is going to feel like that just because there’s so little information available in English about North Korea.
  • We Can Remember It for You Wholesale (Wikipedia link with spoilers), by Phillip K. Dick. This is the novella that the movie Total Recall (which I haven’t yet seen) was loosely based on. The premise is that memories are malleable, and can be implanted and removed or covered over. There’s a bit of an industry in giving people fake memories of things they want to do but can’t afford, like a vacation to Mars, or memories that are essentially fantasy fulfilment, like having been a secret agent. Of course, in the novella, things eventually go wrong...
  • Rogue Moon (Wikipedia link with spoilers) by Algis Budrys. Part of the premise of this short novel is that the Americans (still in the throes of the space race with the Soviets) have developed a sort of teleportation along the lines of Star Trek’s transporter: your body is taken apart here by a scanning beam that records the position and motion of every atom in it (in the novel’s decidedly non-quantum physics), and then recreated from raw materials at the receiving site. (In fact, I have no evidence of this but I suspect this novel was the inspiration for the transporter; the novel was published in 1960 and won a Hugo in 1961, so it’s easy to imagine that Roddenberry or one of his colleagues might have remembered it while they sat around a table trying to figure out a plausible way to avoid having to do expensive and time-consuming planet-landing shots.) But the novel makes quite a lot of the fact that the original body is destroyed, and the person who appears at the receiving site is a replica, albeit with all of the original’s memories. This was a good read despite, or perhaps because of, being so dated; it was fascinating to read hard science fiction with extremely futuristic technology set in the Cold-War early 1960s, with the social expectations and prejudices of the time.
  • And I’m not nearly through it, but I’ve recently started The Swerve: How the World Became Modern, by Stephen Greenblatt, which is fascinating so far. It tells the story of how Lucretius’ philosophical poem On the Nature of Things, lost for centuries, was discovered in the early 15th century, and of its huge impact on the course of Western intellectual history.
And I’ve already mentioned that plumtreeblossom and I watched King Corn the other day, and that we’ve been watching Ken Burns’ The Civil War (Wikipedia, PBS). I think the juxtaposition of We Can Remember It for You Wholesale, Rogue Moon, and Moon, which plumtreeblossom and I watched a few weeks ago, was a particularly good one; they all muse on identity, consciousness, and personhood in very similar ways. I’m glad I happened to encounter them around the same time.
Comments 
24th-Feb-2012 03:32 am (UTC)
somewhere between 'Wikipedia' and 'PBS' you have an error in your HTML that is eating up a whole bunch of your text.
24th-Feb-2012 03:34 am (UTC)
Yup, fixed. Wow, you’re fast! :-)
24th-Feb-2012 04:09 am (UTC)
It's nice to see somebody reading old SF. I have a lot of fond memories of some really oooold stories, but most people don't read those anymore.
24th-Feb-2012 05:05 pm (UTC)
I look forward to reading some of those, especially the North Korea book. :-)

Loving you!
25th-Feb-2012 04:08 pm (UTC)
Sounds like one of those perfect confluences of influences. (*looks up 'confluence' to make sure that's what she wanted to say*) Yes. :) Now I want to see the movie, Moon! Seems ironic to me that it gets this "Fresh" rating from the Rotten Tomatoes site, while Ebert recognizes that it's actually throw-back old fashioned sci-fi, at least in the written tradition of sci-fi.
This page was loaded Jun 25th 2019, 3:37 pm GMT.